Tribunal to rule on Ashiru, PDP’s ballot recount motion on May 27
to allow the three respondents in the petition, Governor-Elect, El-Rufai , APC and INEC to file their responses.
At the resumed hearing in the motion which is part of the pre-hearing sittings, the PDP applied to amend its earlier application for the recount of the entire ballot to 12 local government areas mostly in the central and northern parts of the state.
The petitioners now applied for the recount in Kaduna North, Kaduna South, Igabi, Birnin Gwari, Giwa, Zaria, Sabon Gari, Makarfi, Kudan, Kubau, Soba and Ikara local government areas, mostly won by the APC.
Mr. Emmanuel Ukala (SAN) told newsmen after the adjournment that: “what we have done this morning is to move the motion for the ballot recount, which is to recount the ballot papers in certain local government areas where we are saying that votes were simply allocated.
“We are saying that in order to meet the justice of the case, it is proper to have that recount. We are surprise surprised that INEC who conducted the election and respondents who said they have won the election, would be shy of wanting that recount to be done.
“The application we have done in the court is been done in the past, they even cited the case of Oshomhole and INEC were recounting was done and it has been done in other cases.
“So it is something that we know in our jurisprudents. We just want recount and whatever the result turns out to be we will be happy and abide by it.
“We also filed motions to strike out certain paragraph of their response, because once those paragraphs are struck out, they will definitely have nothing to respond too,“ Ukala said.
However, Counsel to INEC, Mr. Aliyu Umar (SAN) said there was a motion asking for recount by the petitioner, but was opposed to by the respondents.
“And a ruling is going to be delivered on Tuesday next week on whether or not there is going to be a recount of those ballot papers.
“We opposed the recount because, in all legal contest especially election matters, you are supposed to state the fact upon which you are challenging the election.
“There are normally three grounds to challenge the outcome of an election, which are non-compliance, corrupt practices or the person declared was not elected by majority of lawful votes. They now lump up these three processes together,“ Umar said.
Mr. Abdulhakeem Mustapha (SAN), Counsel to El-Rufai also told newsmen that: “we also opposed to that application because it is not in consonance with the extant provisions of the relevant electoral laws.
“What they are trying to do is that through the back door, move the court to grant an application that will decide the matter at the preliminary stage.
“We opposed to it and we marshaled our point that, this is not the right time for that type of application,“ Mustapha said.