The Senate has cautioned Pastor Tunde Bakare against channelling his political frustrations at the 10th National Assembly.
This was stated by the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Yemi Adaramodu, on Tuesday, in a written response to what he described as the cleric’s recent remarks, which included “sweeping generalisations and disparaging commentary aimed at the institution of the National Assembly.”
Adaramodu acknowledged the right of every citizen, regardless of status, to comment on national issues.
However, he noted that the Senate felt compelled to respond when such remarks veer into “unwarranted invective and misleading assertions,” which, he said, could undermine public confidence in democratic institutions.
He said, “Pastor Bakare, a cleric and political voice in his own right, has previously contributed to national discourse in ways that have spurred reflection and debate.
“However, his most recent statements veer away from constructive criticism into rhetoric, unfortunately laced with contempt and unsubstantiated claims.
“It is also important to acknowledge that Pastor Bakare was a presidential aspirant in the last general elections and a vice-presidential candidate in a previous electoral cycle.
We view his corrosive criticisms of the National Assembly as a biased and political ecumenical homily.
“While he remains a respected cleric, his role as a prominent political figure cannot be discounted when assessing the lens through which his comments are made.
“His position as a political leader influences the context of his statements, which are not only reflections of personal views but also carry significant political implications.”
The Senate Spokesman further stated, “We also wish to note that Pastor Bakare is not only a cleric and political figure but also one with a legal background.
“He is, therefore, well aware of the constitutional boundaries that guide public commentary—particularly on matters that are sub judice.
The National Assembly cannot and will not be drawn into responding to issues that are already before a court of competent jurisdiction, out of respect for the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary.
“While some may attempt to portray an unnecessary adversarial dynamic between the National Assembly and the Executive arm of government as a marker of virility in checks and balances, we must clarify that such tension, though it may entertain some, does not necessarily equate to effective legislative oversight.
