#RevolutionNow: Court Hears Sowore, Bakare’s Bail Application

Welcome to live updates page on the bail application filed by the convener of #RevolutionNow protest, Mr Omoyele Sowore, and his co-defendant, Mr Olawale Bakare.

The duo were arraigned by the Federal Government on seven charges bordering on alleged conspiracy to commit treason and money laundering among others.

They were brought to the Federal High Court on Monday by operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS).

However, Sowore and Bakare pleaded not guilty to all the charges against them.

Stay with us for updates on the proceedings…

11:34 AM: Replying on points of law, Falana said the defendant have not been charged along with Kanu and that, in fact, in the proof of evidence the first defendant asked Kanu to come back and build Nigeria.

He added that Kanu’s case has no nexus with this and if they want him back, there is an extradition agreement between Nigeria and Britain but the Federal Government is not willing.

11:20 AM: As such, the court should take judicial notice of the case where the defendant has jumped bail and these defendants are likely to jump bail.

11:15 AM: He said he is ready for an accelerated hearing if it means hearing the case day-to-day.

He concluded by referring the court to the case of Nnamdi Kanu vs Federal Government 2015 in which the defendant is charged in similar circumstances and after he was granted bail by the court, he jumped bail.

11:12 AM: For the second defendant, Liman said he filed a 20-paragraph affidavit along with a written address which he adopts as his argument in the application.

He adopted his argument in respect of the first defendant, most especially on the issue of the severity of the offence.

11:10 AM: Liman, therefore, urged the court to hold that the documents are worthless pieces of papers and of no value.

He also asked the court to dismiss the bail application as bail is granted on special circumstances which the applicant has not satisfied.

11:09 AM: The prosecutor also submitted that the exhibits relied upon in the further affidavit of the defendant to say that other senior citizens of this country, including the President talked of revolution.

He said it is an effort by the first defendant to justify the action he is being tried for.

He submitted that it is not relevant for the consideration for whether or not the applicant should be granted bail.

11:06 AM: Liman stated that to demonstrate this, the first defendant when he was being taken away from the court on Monday, shouted ‘revolution’.

READ  Man Jailed For Life For Raping 14-Year-Old Stepdaughter In Cross River State

He said this averment of the conduct of the applicant has not been countered anywhere in the affidavit and it shows that the applicant if released is ready to resume.

11:05 AM: Liman, therefore, submits that the court should look at the severity of the case and likelihood of the defendant to jump bail.

He also said that one of the reasons bail should not be granted is the likelihood of the defendant repeating the offence.

11:04 AM: He told the court that this is an offence that is punishable by life imprisonment or any other capital punishment.

11:03 AM: Mr Liman, on his part, stated that the Abiola case was a decision of the appeal court alone and was as far back as the 90s’ but the case of Asari Dokubo was delivered in 2007 and that once there is threat to national security and if the severity of the event is high.

11:01 AM: Falana said this was stated specifically in the counter-affidavit of the prosecution.

He submitted further that as in Asari Dokubo, if the offence or allegation involves the issue of national security unless if the defendant shows special circumstances, bail will be granted but in Asari Dokubo, all the courts of the land refused to grant bail.

10:59 AM: He, therefore, submitted that in similar circumstances like the case at hand the Federal High Court, the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court held that Asari Dokubo if granted bail will not make himself available for trial because he was a flight risk.

10:58 AM: Falana said he relies heavily on the case of Asari Dokubo vs the State in which Asari Dokubo was charged with criminal felony under Section 40 of the Criminal Code and the two defendants on charge one and the two before the court are charged for conspiracy to commit treason and treasonable felony like Asari Dokubo.

10:50 AM: In summary, Falana referred to a write-up by late Akinola Aguda where he warned that except fear of economic hardship is removed, the country is in danger of crimes.

He adds that the write-up was done in 1985 and urged the court to admit Bakare to bail in self-recorgnisance.

10:48 AM: He said that the complainant has no serious complaint to his bail application as the defendant does not leave in the US and cannot run away.

He said Bakare leaves in Osogbo and will not go anywhere.

READ  Newsfield Media Creating Social Media Awareness Benefits To Imo Local Government Councils

10:47 AM: With respect to the second defendant, Mr Olawale Bakare, Falana adopted his written submission.

10:46 AM: Falana concluded that many paragraphs of the prosecutor’s counter-affidavit are erroneous and should be struck out and if they are dismissed, it means that the application is unchallenged.

10:45 AM: He also quoted the case of Dr Beko Ransom-Kuti and four others vs The State, saying he was personally involved and they were granted bail by a Magistrate Court in Gwagwalada in the sum of N20,000.

10:44 AM: Falana also cited the case of Ameh Obute vs The State in 1994 saying out of the persons charged for treason, four of them are in the APC today and are the leaders, including Ahmed Tinubu, Ameh Obute and Senator Ibrahim, and were all granted bail on self-recognisance.

10:43 AM: Citing the case of Abiola where he was charged with treason and treasonable felony, Falana said Abiola was granted bail by the Court of Appeal on self-recognisance and asked him not to engage in any activity that will jeopardise the peace of the country.

10:42 AM: On the second charge which is alleged transfer of money to Sowore’s company, Falana stated that the defendant transferred his own money and it was termed money laundering.
He added that the prosecutor advanced Asari Dokubo’s case and it is nowhere related to this case because Asari was nailed by his own statement where he said he blew up pipelines but nowhere in Sowore’s statement to DSS did he state or agreed to have done any wrong.

10:39 AM: Falana added that the current law now is that where there is a protest, the police should provide protection.

10:32 AM: He stated that the only time Nigerians have ever been prosecuted for a call for revolution was in 1948, reported in 1949 Rosita Ogbuna vs Rex.

According to him, those young men were charged with sedition.

10:28 AM: He insisted that there is nowhere it has been stated or shown that the first defend (Sowore) called for violence.

He further stated that the use of the word “revolution” has never been criminalised in Nigeria.

Hence, President Muhammadu Buhari called for a revolution and was never arrested or criminalised.

10:27 AM: Falana said in the counter affidavit, he has shown that leaders of the ruling party, including the President, has been calling for a revolution such as in 2011 when the President called for a revolution like that of Egypt.

READ  Ortom Reacts On Benue Gang Leader, Agwaza Alias Gana’s Killing

10:25 AM: Falana further stated that there is a counter-affidavit filed by the prosecutor that the first defendant may not stand trial because he resides in the United States.

And that because one Nnamdi Kanu who was charged before this court jumped bail, the first defendant should not be granted bail.

Falana, however, filed a counter-affidavit and replied on points of law to the effect that in the entire grounds of the submission of the prosecutor who is the complainant, the fear or allegation is that the first defendant was going to overthrow the Government of Nigeria but no evidence was adduced to that claim.

10:25 AM: Falana said that the first defendant is presumed innocent by virtue of Section 36 of the 1999 Constitution and as such, the onus is on the prosecution to convince the court why the first defendant should not be admitted to bail.

10:23 AM: Falana also applied to the court to allow him adopt the written address.

He adds that the application is hinged on the fact that the first defendant has never committed an offence before and that investigation of his case has been concluded.

He also said the first defendant said he will never interfere or make contact with the witness of the prosecution.

10:18 AM: Falana said the motion is praying the court to admit Sowore to bail in liberal terms.

According to him, the application is supported by a 22-paragraph affidavit, three exhibits a, b, and c and a written address, as well as a certificate for compliance.

10:08 AM: The hearing has resumed. Mr Falana informed the court that there are three applications.

He said the first application for the first defendant which is Sowore was filed on September 30.

9:40 AM: The matter has been stood down for 30 minutes.
This is to allow the counsel to the defendants, Falana, to completely file his reply to the counter affidavit filed by the prosecutor, Hassan Liman, asking the court to turn down the application for Sowore and Bakare’s bail.

9:23 AM: Sitting has commenced and a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mr Femi Falana, is in court to represent the defendants.

9:18 AM: The practice of allowing journalists to take shots before the judge arrives has been prevented by men of the DSS.

They did not give any reasons but made journalists promise not to take shots.


Recommended For You

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: